Given a large array of integers, implement a function to sort the array using multiple threads. Your solution should leverage parallelism to improve sorting performance over a single-threaded approach.
Example 1: Input: arr = [3, 1, 4, 1, 5, 9, 2, 6, 5, 3, 5] Output: [1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 5, 5, 6, 9]
Example 2: Input: arr = [10, 5, 2, 3, 7, 6, 1, 8, 4] Output: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10]
To solve this problem, you can follow these steps:
Here's a high-level implementation in Python:
`python import threading
def parallel_sort(arr, low, high, result): if low < high: mid = (low + high) // 2 left_thread = threading.Thread(target=parallel_sort, args=(arr, low, mid, result)) right_thread = threading.Thread(target=parallel_sort, args=(arr, mid + 1, high, result))
left_thread.start()
right_thread.start()
left_thread.join()
right_thread.join()
merge(arr, low, mid, high, result)
def merge(arr, low, mid, high, result): left = arr[low:mid + 1] right = arr[mid + 1:high + 1]
left_index = 0
right_index = 0
i = low
while left_index < len(left) and right_index < len(right):
if left[left_index] <= right[right_index]:
result[i] = left[left_index]
left_index += 1
else:
result[i] = right[right_index]
right_index += 1
i += 1
while left_index < len(left):
result[i] = left[left_index]
left_index += 1
i += 1
while right_index < len(right):
result[i] = right[right_index]
right_index += 1
i += 1
def multi_threaded_sort(arr): result = [0] * len(arr) parallel_sort(arr, 0, len(arr) - 1, result) return result
arr = [3, 1, 4, 1, 5, 9, 2, 6, 5, 3, 5] sorted_arr = multi_threaded_sort(arr) print(sorted_arr) `
This solution divides the input array into smaller subarrays and sorts each subarray in parallel using separate threads. After sorting each subarray, it merges the sorted subarrays to obtain the final sorted array.